Comments on: Thurso Surf WaterWalker 126 SUP Board Review (2024)

By: Alli Blackmon - SupBoardGuide.com Staff Writer

Alli Blackmon - SupBoardGuide.com Staff Writer — Thu, 09 Jun 2022 21:31:54 +0000

In reply to Sharon.

Hi Sharon,

I’d recommend looking into the Waterwalker 132 instead of the Waterwalker 126. It’s 11′ x 32″. so you’ll have a little bit more volume/stability when you bring along passengers than you would on the 126. That being said, the main difference between the Waterwalker (both the 126 and the 132 versions) and the 11′ iROCKER All-around is deck pad space. Both are stable, fun to paddle, and come with a great kit, but the 11′ all-around from iROCKER has a longer deck pad. If you have a larger dog, this might be a factor to consider. You could also check out on page of Best SUPs for Dogs.

By: Sharon

Sharon — Thu, 09 Jun 2022 17:23:32 +0000

I am a first time SUP purchaser. I am 5’4 at 135lbs and am wavering between this and the Irocker 11 all around. I do want to be able to take a dog out with me and possibly another low weight rider like my daughter and am torn between the two boards. We SUP at lakes where boats frequent so being able to handle flat water and some chop here and there is a must.

By: Justin - SupBoardGuide

Justin - SupBoardGuide — Tue, 13 Apr 2021 16:23:24 +0000

In reply to Steve.

Steve,

As a beginner at 6ft and 215 lbs, I’d recommend that you go with either the Thurso 132, or the iRocker 11′ All Around. I don’t think the Bluefin Cruise Carbon 10’8 will be quite as good for you (although I think the 12′ would be a great option if it were in stock).

Between the iRocker and the Thurso it really comes down to your preference. The iRocker is a little bit lighter, has more accessory options, but the Thurso is a little cleaner design and also has a great feel in the water.

I hope that helps!

By: Steve

Steve — Tue, 13 Apr 2021 16:15:02 +0000

I’m 6ft 215ibs. Trying to decide between the iRocker All Around, Bluefin Carben 10’8 (since 12 is out of stock) and Thurso. Any recommendations. And I’m a beginner.

By: Justin - SupBoardGuide

Justin - SupBoardGuide — Wed, 17 Mar 2021 16:49:11 +0000

In reply to Greg.

Greg,

That’s a great question. The main reason we rank the iRocker higher is because it’s lighter than the Thurso. However, the heavier weight gives the Thurso a really solid feeling on the water, and we really like that about Thurso. If the extra weight isn’t an issue for you, then I would feel very comfortable recommending you go with whichever board you like the looks of better. That might sound like a flimsy recommendation, but I do think the looks of the board matter a lot, and that is a personal preference 100%.

By: Greg

Greg — Tue, 16 Mar 2021 21:59:53 +0000

Hi there! How would you compare it to irocker all around board? I noticed you graded irocker board slightly higher (9.9 vs 9.4). Is IROCKER a better buy in your opinion?

By: Justin - SupBoardGuide

Justin - SupBoardGuide — Fri, 25 Sep 2020 16:34:44 +0000

In reply to Siobhan.

Siobhan,

You really can’t go wrong with either SUP – both are great. My personal recommendation would be the Thurso 126. I like the carbon fiber rails and how firm the board feels while paddling. The only downside is that the Thurso weights a few lbs more than the Atoll. So, if weight is a big consideration than I’d say go with the Atoll 11′.

By: Siobhan

Siobhan — Wed, 23 Sep 2020 19:09:49 +0000

Hi there –

I’m wavering between this board and the Atoll 11′. Both boards are well reviewed and look like great choices.

I’m in Florida, and would mostly use the board in saltwater waterways and protected inlets that can occasionally have light boat choppiness. I’m 5’7 about 150 pounds.

Thoughts on which board would suit my needs best. They both look great, but I do like how Thurso has some nice add-ons like the paddle mount.